Julius v. Pnc Bank

District of Columbia

Julius v. Pnc Bank

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJanuary 10, 2012

DocketCivil Action No. 2012-0026

StatusPublished

This text of Julius v. Pnc Bank (Julius v. Pnc Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Julius v. Pnc Bank, (D.D.C. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT 0F COLUMBIA J 1 o 2012

g s::::'i:'.;:..“.f:::;:.iz:'z::::.e.:zia

Plaintiff, ) v. i civil A¢u@n NO. “Qm

PNC BANK, g

Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and the complaint.

ii l Although the plaintiff manages to demand a trial without a jury and damages of $999,999,999,999.00, the complaint is completely devoid of a meaningful factual allegation At most the complaint’s purported assertions "constitute the sort of patently insubstantial claims" deprive the Court of subject matter jurisdiction Tooley v. Napolz'tano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

An Order is issued separately

DATE,; }/Ly/ , q,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI