Julius Martin v. State
This text of Julius Martin v. State (Julius Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JULIUS MARTIN,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-3222
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 24, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Mark S. Blechman, Judge.
Julius Martin, Milton, pro se.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentences, but we do so without prejudice to
Appellant to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a)(5). See Abbas v. State, 53 So. 3d 1207, 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (affirming judgment and sentence following the trial court’s
summary denial of the defendant’s motion to withdraw plea that was “devoid of factual
allegations in support of the requested relief,” but without prejudice to the defendant filing
“a timely, facially sufficient motion pursuant to [rule] 3.850”).
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Julius Martin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-martin-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.