Julius Maloy, III. v. State
Opinion
V.
Julius Maloy, II, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion is signed by Maloy and by his counsel in compliance with Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
Jack Carter
Justice
Date Submitted: January 5, 2009
Date Decided: January 6, 2009
Do Not Publish
eed to protect the parties' rights, we are also aware that further delay in disposing of this appeal is pointless, since the appellant has entirely failed to provide a record. See Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 1998, pet. ref'd).
The appeal is dismissed.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: September 4, 2002
Date Decided: September 5, 2002
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Julius Maloy, III. v. State (Julius Maloy, III. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.