Julius Kessler & Co. v. Klein

Eighth Circuit

Julius Kessler & Co. v. Klein

177 F. 394, 101 C.C.A. 478, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5214

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 22, 1910

DocketNo. 3,063

StatusPublished

This text of 177 F. 394 (Julius Kessler & Co. v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Julius Kessler & Co. v. Klein, 177 F. 394, 101 C.C.A. 478, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5214 (8th Cir. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill for want of equity. The relief sought was an injunctive order against the infringement of a trade-mark and an accounting of damages and profits.

[395]*395The facts and questions of law involved are substantially like those in the «•ase of Kessler & Company v. Goldsfrom (just decided) 177 Eod. 392, and for the reasons stated in that case the decree in this must be reversed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to enter a decree awarding complainant the injunctive relief prayed for. in the bill, and conforming in other respects to the views expressed in the opinion in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill for want of equity. The relief sought was an injunctive order against the infringement of a trade-mark and an accounting of damages and profits.

[395]*395The facts and questions of law involved are substantially like those in the «•ase of Kessler & Company v. Goldsfrom (just decided) 177 Eod. 392, and for the reasons stated in that case the decree in this must be reversed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court, with directions to enter a decree awarding complainant the injunctive relief prayed for. in the bill, and conforming in other respects to the views expressed in the opinion in that case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 F. 394, 101 C.C.A. 478, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-kessler-co-v-klein-ca8-1910.