Julius Johnson v. Neal Verman and Amitha Verman
This text of Julius Johnson v. Neal Verman and Amitha Verman (Julius Johnson v. Neal Verman and Amitha Verman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Julius Johnson v. Neal Verman and Amitha Verman
Appellate case number: 01-22-00154-CV
Trial court case number: 1178514
Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County
Appellant Julius Johnson filed in the trial court a statement of inability to afford court costs on March 22, 2022. The statement of inability is prima facie evidence of inability to afford payment of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145. No opposition was filed and no order overruling his claim of inability was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b). Thus, appellant Julius Jones is not required to pay costs in the appellate court. See id. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court shall indicate in the Court’s file that appellant Julius Jones is not required to pay any costs on appeal. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightower Acting individually
Date: December 13, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Julius Johnson v. Neal Verman and Amitha Verman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-johnson-v-neal-verman-and-amitha-verman-texapp-2022.