Julius E. Black v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 2017
Docket5D16-3695
StatusPublished

This text of Julius E. Black v. State (Julius E. Black v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julius E. Black v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JULIUS E. BLACK,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-3695

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 13, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Julius E. Black, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Julius E. Black appeals the denial of two motions for leave to amend his original

motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court

ruled on the merits of the amendments to the claims included in the motions, we treat the

motions as amended motions under rule 3.850. Thus, we consider the orders denying

the motions as final appealable orders. However, the appeal of the order denying the first

motion was untimely, and this court lacks jurisdiction to review it. The appeal of the order

dated September 27, 2016, which denied the second motion to amend, was timely filed. Nevertheless, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter that order because the

amendment related to a claim in the original rule 3.850 motion that was being reviewed

on appeal by this court (case number 5D16-1952) at the time the trial court entered the

order. We therefore reverse the order dated September 27, 2016, and remand this case

so the trial court may rule upon the second motion to amend when jurisdiction returns to

the trial court following the conclusion of the appeal in case number 5D16-4327.

REVERSED; REMANDED.

SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Julius E. Black v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-e-black-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.