Julius Dwaine Perry, Sr. v. George Bammar, Officer, Raymond W. May, Warden, the United States of America

330 F.2d 240
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 1964
Docket19028_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 330 F.2d 240 (Julius Dwaine Perry, Sr. v. George Bammar, Officer, Raymond W. May, Warden, the United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julius Dwaine Perry, Sr. v. George Bammar, Officer, Raymond W. May, Warden, the United States of America, 330 F.2d 240 (9th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from a nonappealable order, namely, a dismissal of one defendant, the United States of America, in an action for slander (mislabeled an action for libel) upon the grounds the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for lack of jurisdiction.

Additionally, it is clear that the plaintiff has sued in the wrong forum.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 F.2d 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-dwaine-perry-sr-v-george-bammar-officer-raymond-w-may-warden-ca9-1964.