Julius C. Harper, A/K/A J. C. Harper v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Julius C. Harper, A/K/A J. C. Harper v. United States

334 F.2d 180, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4763

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1964·No. 20918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the contention of appellant that he was entitled to have a directed verdict of acquittal of this 5 Count charge of violating Title 18 § 152 of the United States Code. 1 We conclude that there was ample evidence of the purpose and intent, and, the transfer being undisputed, we conclude that the case was properly submitted to the jury.

There is no merit in the contention, not made before or during the trial, that the indictment was defective.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. This section makes criminal the transfer of property in contemplation of bankruptcy proceedings or with intent to defeat the bankruptcy law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the contention of appellant that he was entitled to have a directed verdict of acquittal of this 5 Count charge of violating Title 18 § 152 of the United States Code. 1 We conclude that there was ample evidence of the purpose and intent, and, the transfer being undisputed, we conclude that the case was properly submitted to the jury.

There is no merit in the contention, not made before or during the trial, that the indictment was defective.

The judgment is affirmed.

1

. This section makes criminal the transfer of property in contemplation of bankruptcy proceedings or with intent to defeat the bankruptcy law.

Julius C. Harper, A/K/A J. C. Harper v. United States, 334 F.2d 180, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4763 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

334 F.2d 180 (Julius C. Harper, A/K/A J. C. Harper v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related