Julius and Adesuwa Obasohan v. Bobby Tran

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 29, 2023
Docket01-22-00934-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Julius and Adesuwa Obasohan v. Bobby Tran (Julius and Adesuwa Obasohan v. Bobby Tran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julius and Adesuwa Obasohan v. Bobby Tran, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 29, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00934-CV ——————————— JULIUS OBASOHAN AND ADESUWA OBASOHAN, Appellants V. BOBBY TRAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 22-CCV-071544

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Julius Obasohan and Adesuwa Obasohan, proceeding pro se, filed

a notice of appeal from the trial court’s December 15, 2022 order. Appellants have

failed to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief). The clerk’s record was filed on January 20, 2023, and the reporter’s record

was filed on April 26, 2023. Accordingly, appellants’ brief was due to be filed on

or before May 26, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellants did not file an

appellants’ brief.

On June 6, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that this appeal

was subject to dismissal unless a brief, or a motion to extend time to file a brief, was

filed within ten days of the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of

appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal for want of

prosecution), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case for failure to comply

with notice from Clerk of Court). Despite notice that this appeal was subject to

dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(b), 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Julius and Adesuwa Obasohan v. Bobby Tran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-and-adesuwa-obasohan-v-bobby-tran-texapp-2023.