Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Julis v. Julis

Julis v. Julis

297 A.D.2d 783, 747 N.Y.2d 804, 747 N.Y.S.2d 804, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8922
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 783 (Julis v. Julis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julis v. Julis, 297 A.D.2d 783, 747 N.Y.2d 804, 747 N.Y.S.2d 804, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[784]*784The appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was, in effect, to resettle the parties’ judgment of divorce must be dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying resettlement of the substantive or decretal paragraphs of a judgment (see Scopelliti v Scopelliti, 250 AD2d 752; EQK Green Acres v United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 248 AD2d 667; Verdrager v Verdrager, 230 AD2d 786; Blaustein v Blaustein, 145 AD2d 591). The appeal from so much of the order as failed to determine that branch of the cross motion which was for downward modification of the defendant’s child support obligation must also be dismissed as that branch of the motion remains pending and undecided (see Mahoney v Mahoney, 272 AD2d 303; Katz v Katz, 68 AD2d 536). Altman, J.P., Florio, O’Brien and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Katz v. Katz
68 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Blaustein v. Blaustein
145 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Verdrager v. Verdrager
230 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
EQK Green Acres, L.P. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
248 A.D.2d 667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Scopelliti v. Scopelliti
250 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Mahoney v. Mahoney
272 A.D.2d 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 783, 747 N.Y.2d 804, 747 N.Y.S.2d 804, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julis-v-julis-nyappdiv-2002.