Julio Torres Palomo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 2015·No. 06-14-00076-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00076-CR

JULIO TORRES PALOMO, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 28777

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

ORDER

Our review of the court reporter’s record and clerk’s record in this case indicates that both such records contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). Both records include the names of persons who were minors at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(f) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(f). Therefore, because the court reporter’s record and clerk’s record contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, to seal the electronically filed reporter’s record and clerk’s record in this case. See id.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: January 27, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julio Torres Palomo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Julio Torres Palomo v. State (Julio Torres Palomo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.