JULIO SANTIEXPOSITO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of JULIO SANTIEXPOSITO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (JULIO SANTIEXPOSITO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 2, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1424 Lower Tribunal No. F16-3147 ________________
Julio Santiexposito, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen Cabarga, Judge.
Julio Santiexposito, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, HENDON and LOBREE, JJ.
HENDON, J.
The issues raised by the defendant are procedurally barred as they should have and could have been raised on direct appeal, see Byrd v. State, 597 So. 2d 252, 254 (Fla.1992) (holding that post-conviction relief cannot be based on grounds which either were or could have been raised on direct appeal); Morejon v. Moore, 738 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (same), or are conclusively refuted by the record, see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JULIO SANTIEXPOSITO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julio-santiexposito-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.