Julio Cesar Ortiz v. State
This text of Julio Cesar Ortiz v. State (Julio Cesar Ortiz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-00-630-CR and 13-00-631-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
________________________________________________________________
JULIO CESAR ORTIZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 103rd District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.
________________________________________________________________
O P I N I O N
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant seeks to appeal from orders continuing or modifying community supervision. We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.
In Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977), the Court held that a defendant may not appeal from an order continuing a defendant on probation with amended terms and conditions. There is neither constitutional nor statutory authority which would confer jurisdiction on this Court to hear an appeal from an order modifying probationary conditions. Basaldua, 558 S.W.2d at 5.
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 24th day of May, 2001 .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Julio Cesar Ortiz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julio-cesar-ortiz-v-state-texapp-2001.