Julie Gaskins v. Omotayo Abiodun

649 F. App'x 307
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2016·No. 16-1066·Unpublished·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julie A. Gaskins appeals the district court’s order denying relief in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gaskins v. Abiodun, No. 1:15— cv-02961-JKB (D.Md. Jan. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julie Gaskins v. Omotayo Abiodun, 649 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2016).

649 F. App'x 307 (Julie Gaskins v. Omotayo Abiodun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related