Julie Delaney v. Victor R. Cade, D.O. St. Joseph Memorial Hospital Central Kansas Medical Center, and L.G. Stephenson & Co., Inc.

Tenth Circuit

Julie Delaney v. Victor R. Cade, D.O. St. Joseph Memorial Hospital Central Kansas Medical Center, and L.G. Stephenson & Co., Inc.

26 F.3d 991, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13290, 1994 WL 236975

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided June 3, 1994·No. 91-3358·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

This matter is before us following a response by the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas to our certification of the question whether Kansas recognizes the theory of the loss of chance of recovery. See Delaney v. Cade, 255 Kan. 199, 873 P.2d 175 (1994). The certified question having been answered affirmatively, the portion of the judgment over which we retained jurisdiction in this matter is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

This matter is before us following a response by the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas to our certification of the question whether Kansas recognizes the theory of the loss of chance of recovery. See Delaney v. Cade, 255 Kan. 199, 873 P.2d 175 (1994). The certified question having been answered affirmatively, the portion of the judgment over which we retained jurisdiction in this matter is REVERSED and the cause REMANDED for further proceedings. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Julie Delaney v. Victor R. Cade, D.O. St. Joseph Memorial Hospital Central Kansas Medical Center, and L.G. Stephenson & Co., Inc., 26 F.3d 991, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 13290, 1994 WL 236975 (10th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

26 F.3d 991 (Julie Delaney v. Victor R. Cade, D.O. St. Joseph Memorial Hospital Central Kansas Medical Center, and L.G. Stephenson & Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related