Julie C. W. v. Frank Mitchell W. Jr. - Concurring
This text of Julie C. W. v. Frank Mitchell W. Jr. - Concurring (Julie C. W. v. Frank Mitchell W. Jr. - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
02/26/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 28, 2021 Session
JULIE C. W. v. FRANK MITCHELL W. JR.1
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 13D-1587 Philip E. Smith, Judge
No. M2019-01243-COA-R3-CV
KRISTI M. DAVIS, J., concurring.
I agree with the analysis and result of the majority opinion. I write separately to address one troubling issue—the Trial Court’s findings regarding Wife’s spending $2,000 per month on food for herself and her two teenagers.
Although the Trial Court found that Wife’s testimony was not credible in several respects, the Trial Court focused on Wife’s testimony regarding food expenses and expressed outrage over the amount. Yet, the Trial Court had no issue with Husband’s budget of $2,600 per month for food for himself. I am perplexed by this discrepancy and further note that $2,000 per month for food for three people (including two teenagers) is wholly reasonable, particularly given these parties’ incomes.
s/ Kristi M. Davis_________________ KRISTI M. DAVIS, JUDGE
1 Given the sensitive subject matter regarding one of the parties’ children, we decline to use the parties’ full last names.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Julie C. W. v. Frank Mitchell W. Jr. - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julie-c-w-v-frank-mitchell-w-jr-concurring-tennctapp-2021.