Julie Ann Domotor v. Judge Richard I. Wennett
This text of 356 F. App'x 316 (Julie Ann Domotor v. Judge Richard I. Wennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The district court dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), appellant’s claims for false arrest and false imprisonment, and for conspiracy to commit those offenses, because those claims, if successful, would have negated appellant’s underlying criminal convictions. She now appeals the dismissal. We affirm. As the district court properly explained in its June 30, 2009, 630 F.Supp.2d 1368, order of dismissal, so long as those convictions remain undisturbed, Heck v. Humphrey bars appellant’s claims.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 F. App'x 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julie-ann-domotor-v-judge-richard-i-wennett-ca11-2009.