Julie Ann Domotor v. Judge Richard I. Wennett

356 F. App'x 316
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 11, 2009·No. 09-13873·Unpublished·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), appellant’s claims for false arrest and false imprisonment, and for conspiracy to commit those offenses, because those claims, if successful, would have negated appellant’s underlying criminal convictions. She now appeals the dismissal. We affirm. As the district court properly explained in its June 30, 2009, 630 F.Supp.2d 1368, order of dismissal, so long as those convictions remain undisturbed, Heck v. Humphrey bars appellant’s claims.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julie Ann Domotor v. Judge Richard I. Wennett, 356 F. App'x 316 (11th Cir. 2009).

356 F. App'x 316 (Julie Ann Domotor v. Judge Richard I. Wennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related