Juliann Castro v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Christopher Jones
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 24, 2022
No. 04-21-00420-CV
Juliann CASTRO, Appellant
v.
SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and Christopher Jones, Appellees
From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-03-25646-CV The Honorable Daniel J. Kindred, Judge Presiding
ORDER Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
On October 27, 2021, the district clerk filed the clerk’s record in this appeal. However, on December 22, 2021, the parties in the appeal filed a joint motion requesting that the clerk’s record be revised in toto due to several apparent defects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(d). Therefore, we ORDER the district clerk to file a revised record within thirty days of this order. See id. The clerk’s record will not be deemed filed for purposes of Rule 38.6 (Time to File Briefs) until the revised record is submitted. See id. R. 38.6. “The clerk may consult with the parties concerning the contents of the clerk’s record.” Id. R. 34.5(h). We direct the clerk to confer with parties regarding their broad concerns about the current record.
_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 24th day of January, 2022. ___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Juliann Castro v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Christopher Jones (Juliann Castro v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Christopher Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.