Juliana Ee v. Washington County
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 24 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIANA EE, No. 10-35305
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-01728-HA
v. MEMORANDUM * WASHINGTON COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 11, 2011 Portland, Oregon
Before: THOMAS and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and SELNA,** District Judge.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The Honorable James V. Selna, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Having considered the parties’ briefs, the appellate record, and the
arguments of counsel on March 11, 2011, the court affirms the denial of
defendants’ motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the district
court’s Opinion and Order.
AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Juliana Ee v. Washington County (Juliana Ee v. Washington County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.