Juliana Ee v. Washington County

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Juliana Ee v. Washington County. Read the opinion of the Court — 423 F. App'x 757
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2011·No. 10-35305·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIANA EE, No. 10-35305

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-01728-HA

v. MEMORANDUM * WASHINGTON COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 11, 2011 Portland, Oregon

Before: THOMAS and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and SELNA,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable James V. Selna, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Having considered the parties’ briefs, the appellate record, and the

arguments of counsel on March 11, 2011, the court affirms the denial of

defendants’ motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the district

court’s Opinion and Order.

AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Juliana Ee v. Washington County, (9th Cir. 2011).

Juliana Ee v. Washington County (Juliana Ee v. Washington County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.