Julian v. United States Department of Justice

859 F.2d 124, 1988 WL 104726
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Julian v. United States Department of Justice. Read the opinion of the Court — 806 F.2d 1411
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 12, 1988·No. Nos. 85-2649, 85-2751·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Before WALLACE, ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The Supreme Court’s mandate of May 16, 1988, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1606, 100 L.Ed.2d 1, affirmed this court’s opinion in Julian v. U.S. Department of Justice, No. 85-2649 and Wallace v. U.S. Parole Commission, No. 85-2751, 806 F.2d 1411. We remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with our opinion and the Supreme Court’s mandate.

Subsequent to the issuance of the Supreme Court’s mandate, Margaret J. Wallace, appearing pro per, filed or lodged in this court the following items:

(1) “Amendment to Complaint, Emergency Motion for Damages and Clearance of Record;”

(2) “Amendment to Complaint, Motion to Reopen or Rehearing;”

(3) “Amendment to Complaint, Motion to Restate or Rehearing.”

The Clerk of this court is directed to transmit to the Clerk, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, certified copies of each of the above-referenced papers and the district judge is directed to dispose of the additional claims of Wallace in the exercise of original jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julian v. United States Department of Justice, 859 F.2d 124, 1988 WL 104726 (9th Cir. 1988).

859 F.2d 124 (Julian v. United States Department of Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related