Julian v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Julian v. State

1920 OK CR 3, 186 P. 244, 16 Okla. Crim. 726, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 9

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 10, 1920

DocketNo. A-3414.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 3 (Julian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Julian v. State, 1920 OK CR 3, 186 P. 244, 16 Okla. Crim. 726, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 9 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, George Julian, was tried and convicted on an information charging that in Comanche county, on the *727 12th day of February, 1918, be did unlawfully transport two pints of whisky from a point unknown to the corner of Fifth street and F avenue, in the city of Lawton, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined for 60 days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of $250 and the costs. No brief has been filed. When the case' was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. Which motion is sustained, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, George Julian, was tried and convicted on an information charging that in Comanche county, on the *727 12th day of February, 1918, be did unlawfully transport two pints of whisky from a point unknown to the corner of Fifth street and F avenue, in the city of Lawton, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined for 60 days in the county jail, and to pay a fine of $250 and the costs. No brief has been filed. When the case' was called for final submission, the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. Which motion is sustained, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 3, 186 P. 244, 16 Okla. Crim. 726, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julian-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.