Julian v. Carey
124 A.D.2d 318, 508 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61348
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 16, 1986·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Prior to the commencement of this proceeding, custody of the child had been placed by court order with respondent. Petitioner had the burden of demonstrating a sufficient change in circumstances to show a real need to effect a change to insure the welfare of the child (see, Matter of Miller v Miller, 74 AD2d 663-664). We see no reason on this record to interfere with the discretion exercised by Family Court (see, Veronica M v Jacob N, 55 AD2d 689).
Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Julian v. Carey, 124 A.D.2d 318, 508 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
124 A.D.2d 318 (Julian v. Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. Scott
215 A.D.2d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Boedecker-Frey v. Boedecker-Frey
176 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
144 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)