Julian v. Carey

124 A.D.2d 318, 508 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61348
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 16, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 124 A.D.2d 318 (Julian v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julian v. Carey, 124 A.D.2d 318, 508 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Prior to the commencement of this proceeding, custody of the child had been placed by court order with respondent. Petitioner had the burden of demonstrating a sufficient change in circumstances to show a real need to effect a change to insure the welfare of the child (see, Matter of Miller v Miller, 74 AD2d 663-664). We see no reason on this record to interfere with the discretion exercised by Family Court (see, Veronica M v Jacob N, 55 AD2d 689).

Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. Scott
215 A.D.2d 893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Boedecker-Frey v. Boedecker-Frey
176 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Schwartz v. Schwartz
144 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.2d 318, 508 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julian-v-carey-nyappdiv-1986.