Julian v. Abbott

73 Mo. 580
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Hough, J.

.After a careful examination of all the testimony in this case, we are of opinion that the probate court properly declined to charge the defendant in his final settlement with Lindenbower’s interest in the note of Henderson Jones. The instructions given by the court show that the case was tried upon correct principles, and as the evidence sustains the finding, the judgment will be affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julian v. Abbott, 73 Mo. 580 (Mo. 1881).

73 Mo. 580 (Julian v. Abbott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Estate of Heller
401 N.W.2d 602 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 1986)
In re Portex Oil Co.
43 F. Supp. 859 (D. Oregon, 1942)
Hallway v. Eckler
80 S.W. 46 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
In re Beam
57 P. 854 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1899)
Powell v. Hurt
108 Mo. 507 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
Estate of Meeker v. Swift
45 Mo. App. 186 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)
Powell v. Hurt
31 Mo. App. 632 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1888)
State v. Robinson
79 Mo. 66 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Mosman v. Bender
80 Mo. 579 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)