Julian Terence Martin Jr v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 3, 2016·No. 05-15-01306-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered June 3, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01306-CR

JULIAN TERENCE MARTIN JR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-59221-X

ORDER

Appellant’s May 27, 2016 motion for appointed counsel for appeal is DENIED.

Appellant is represented by counsel who has filed an Anders brief on appellant’s behalf. Upon

submission and review of the case, if the Court determines that an arguable issue for appeal

exists, then the Court will order the appointment of new counsel. See Bledsoe v. State, 178

S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julian Terence Martin Jr v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Julian Terence Martin Jr v. State (Julian Terence Martin Jr v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)