Julian (Quincy) v. State
This text of Julian (Quincy) v. State (Julian (Quincy) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
court's factual findings regarding good cause, but we will review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo."), cert. denied, 568 U.S. , 133 S. Ct. 988 (2013). Furthermore, Julian failed to demonstrate that side effects of the psychotropic drugs should excuse the entire delay. See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252-53, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003) (holding that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel may excuse a procedural default, but the claim itself must not be procedurally defaulted but must be raised within a reasonable time after discovering it to satisfy good cause). We conclude that the district court did not err in rejecting this good-cause argument and in denying the petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Douglas
J. Saitta
cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Story Law Group Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Julian (Quincy) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julian-quincy-v-state-nev-2013.