Julian Ortega v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 7, 2021
Docket03-21-00115-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Julian Ortega v. the State of Texas (Julian Ortega v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julian Ortega v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00115-CR

Julian Ortega, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-21-200066, THE HONORABLE CHANTAL ELDRIDGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Julian Ortega, representing himself pro se, has filed a notice of “direct

appeal,” in which he appears to challenge an emergency protective order signed by a magistrate

on January 3, 2021, following his arrest for assault-family violence.1 See Tex. Code Crim. Proc.

art. 17.292.

The standards for determining whether an appellate court has jurisdiction to hear

and determine a case “is not whether the appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is

authorized by law.” Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (quoting

Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)). In Texas, appeals in criminal

cases are permitted only when they are specifically authorized by statute. State ex. rel. Lykos v.

Fine, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02 (“A

1 By its terms, the emergency protective order expired on February 5, 2021. On March 2, 2021, Ortega was charged by indictment for the offense of assault family-violence. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(b)(2)(A). That charge currently remains pending. defendant in any criminal action has the right of appeal under the rules hereinafter prescribed

. . . .”); Tex. R. App. P. 26.2 (notice of appeal must be filed “within 30 days after day sentence is

imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order”).

Although a defendant may appeal from a judgment of conviction for violation of an emergency

protective order, see e.g., Smith v. State, No. 02-19-00035-CR, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1066,

at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 6, 2020, pet. ref’d) (mem. op. not designated for publication),

no statute authorizes an appeal from an emergency protective order.

Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and the appeal is

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

__________________________________________ Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Kelly

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: May 7, 2021

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abbott v. State
271 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)
State Ex Rel. Lykos v. Fine
330 S.W.3d 904 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Blanton, Donald Gene
369 S.W.3d 894 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Julian Ortega v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julian-ortega-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.