Julian J. Alexander v. Metro Police Department

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JULIAN J. ALEXANDER, Case No.: 2:25-cv-01980-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 11] METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 7 Defendant 8 On April 29, 2026, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Julian Alexander has been unable to comply with Federal of Civil Procedure 8 and state a claim despite multiple opportunities to do so. ECF No. 11. Alexander did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 12}|recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 11) is accepted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 19th day of May, 2026. 21 UIE ANDREWP.GORDON. 3 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE