Julia S. Dillard v. Commissioner

4 T.C.M. 1032, 1945 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 30
United States Tax Court·Decided November 28, 1945·No. Docket No. 539.·Unpublished

Opinion

Julia S. Dillard v. Commissioner.
Julia S. Dillard v. Commissioner
Docket No. 539.
United States Tax Court
1945 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 30; 4 T.C.M. (CCH) 1032; T.C.M. (RIA) 45354;
November 28, 1945
*30

Pursuant to a plan of reorganization, a state bank, in 1933, subscribed to and received all of the capital stock of a newly organized national bank, except directors' qualifying shares, and the new bank acquired part of the old bank's assets. Immediately thereafter, the old bank was in control of the new as control is defined in section 112 (h) of the Internal Revenue Code. The stock of the new bank was pledged to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation by the old bank to secure the loan it had received from the R.F.C. and used for the purchase of the new bank stock. In 1939 the R.F.C. released one-half of the new bank stock to the old bank which then distributed it pro rata to its shareholders and reduced the par value of their stock from $100 to $50. The old bank was in process of liquidation at the time. Held, the receipt of the new bank shares by the shareholders of the old bank was an exchange pursuant to a plan of reorganization and no gain is recognizable on their receipt. Section 112 (b), (g) and(h), Internal Revenue Code, as operative during the taxable year.

J. Fred Brown, Esq. and Allan Davis, Esq., 1200 Commerce Title Bldg., Memphis, Tenn., for the petitioner. Bernard *31D. Hathcock, Esq., for the respondent.

TYSON

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

The respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's income tax liability for the taxable year ended December 31, 1939, in the amount of $348.87, which deficiency is based in part on respondent's determination that

The transaction whereby you received 38 1/2 shares of the capital stock of the National Bank of Commerce from the Bank of Commerce & Trust Company constitutes a distribution in partial liquidation, and the gain therefrom is taxable as a short-term capital gain. Subsections (c) and (i) of Section 115 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Petitioner contests the part of the deficiency based on the transaction mentioned. Other adjustments are not in controversy.

Findings of Fact

The petitioner is a resident citizen of Memphis, Tennessee. Her return for the period here involved was filed with the collector of internal revenue for the District of Tennessee, at Nashville, Tennessee.

Petitioner acquired common capital stock of the Bank of Commerce & Trust Company at the times, in the amounts, and at the costs below stated.

No. of SharesDate AcquiredCost
32Dec. 9, 1926$ 6,200.00
45May 19, 192716,200.00
60June 2, 192721,480.00
94May 31, 1934940.00

The *32Bank of Commerce & Trust Company (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the old bank) is a state banking institution, created and existing under and by authority of the laws of the State of Tennessee. Its offices were located at the southwest corner of Second and Monroe Streets, Memphis, Tennessee. A run on the bank developed in January 1933. To insure payment of its deposits in full, it borrowed $13,000,000 from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, which loan was secured by a pledge of its assets, and an additional pledge of about $2,000,000 of their own assets by individuals who were directors, shareholders, or depositors of the bank. After the declaration of the "Bank Holiday" in February 1933 the question arose as to whether the bank should reopen, or whether the interests of all concerned would best be served by the organization of a new national bank.

A special called meeting of the old bank's board of directors was held on April 27, 1933.

The call for and notice of the meeting provided that it was called, "* * * for the purpose of considering and authorizing the organization of a new national bank, subscribing for capital stock therein by the Bank of Commerce & Trust Company, *33the transfer of the deposits of the Bank of Commerce & Trust Company to the proposed national bank, the transfer of certain assets of the Bank of Commerce and Trust Company to the proposed national bank, to authorize the execution of a Voting Trust Agreement with respect to the stock in the national bank to be subscribed for by the Bank of Commerce & Trust Company, * * * to authorize and approve the making of any and all necessary contracts and agreements with reference to any of said purposes, * * *"

At the meeting the board was told by Phil M. Canale, a director and member of a committee appointed to work out a plan for the reorganization of the bank: that the Comptroller of the Currency had approved plans for the organization of a new national bank to be known as the National Bank of Commerce in Memphis, (someti

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julia S. Dillard v. Commissioner, 4 T.C.M. 1032, 1945 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 30 (tax 1945).

4 T.C.M. 1032 (Julia S. Dillard v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fry v. Commissioner
5 T.C. 1058 (U.S. Tax Court, 1945)