Julia Marie McNeal v. Napolean McNeal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Julia Marie McNeal v. Napolean McNeal

DecidedAugust 19, 2009

Docket12-09-00214-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Julia Marie McNeal v. Napolean McNeal (Julia Marie McNeal v. Napolean McNeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Julia Marie McNeal v. Napolean McNeal, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-09-00214-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JULIA MARIE MCNEAL, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW

NAPOLEAN MCNEAL, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., July 13, 2009. See TEX . R. APP. P. 32.1. On July 13, 2009, this court notified Appellant that she should file a docketing statement within ten days if she had not already done so. On the same date, by separate letter, this court notified Appellant that the filing fee was due on or before July 23, 2009. Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in our July 13, 2009 letter, this court issued a second notice advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice also advised Appellant that the filing fee in the appeal was due to have been paid on or before July 23, 2009 but had not been received. See TEX . R. APP. P. 5. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement and fee were filed on or before August 3, 2009, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement and the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered August 19, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-09-00214-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JULIA MARIE MCNEAL, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT

V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW

NAPOLEAN MCNEAL, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., July 13, 2009. See TEX . R. APP. P. 32.1. On July 13, 2009, this court notified Appellant that she should file a docketing statement within ten days if she had not already done so. On the same date, by separate letter, this court notified Appellant that the filing fee was due on or before July 23, 2009. Because Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested in our July 13, 2009 letter, this court issued a second notice advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice also advised Appellant that the filing fee in the appeal was due to have been paid on or before July 23, 2009 but had not been received. See TEX . R. APP. P. 5. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement and fee were filed on or before August 3, 2009, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement and the filing fee has passed, and Appellant has not complied with the court’s request. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with rules 5 and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Opinion delivered August 19, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Julia Marie McNeal v. Napolean McNeal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julia-marie-mcneal-v-napolean-mcneal-texapp-2009.