Jules v. The City of New York
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: _________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- X DATE FILED: 7/23/2025 : JOSEPHINE M. JULES, : : Plaintiff, : 1:24-cv-10056-GHW : -against- : ORDER OF SERVICE : THE CITY OF NEW YORK, : : Defendant. : : ----------------------------------------------------------------------- X
GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge: Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action against the City of New York alleging state law claims and invoking the Court’s diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. By order dated January 15, 2025, the court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees. Dkt. No. 7. Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, she is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.1 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (providing that the court must order the Marshals Service to effect service “if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis”). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendant the City of New York through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for Defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to
1Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that any summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date any summonses issue. issue a summons and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendant. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summons 1s issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Mezlleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if her address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue a summons for each Defendant, complete the USM-285 form with the address for each Defendant, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2025 New York, New York
United States District Judge
SERVICE ADDRESS FOR DEFENDANT
City of New York 100 Church Street New York, NY 10007
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jules v. The City of New York (Jules v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.