Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Jules v. State

Jules v. State

113 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 461647, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-487
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 So. 3d 949 (Jules v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jules v. State, 113 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 461647, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State properly concedes error on Appellant’s claim that his home-invasion-robbery charge violates double jeopardy in that it arose from the same episode as Appellant’s burglary-with-an-assault-or-battery charge. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence on the home-invasion charge and remand this cause for further proceedings as warranted. In all other respects, we affirm.

AFFIRM in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington v. State
120 So. 3d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 461647, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jules-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.