Jules v. State
113 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 461647, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 2013·No. No. 5D12-487·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The State properly concedes error on Appellant’s claim that his home-invasion-robbery charge violates double jeopardy in that it arose from the same episode as Appellant’s burglary-with-an-assault-or-battery charge. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence on the home-invasion charge and remand this cause for further proceedings as warranted. In all other respects, we affirm.
AFFIRM in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jules v. State, 113 So. 3d 949, 2013 WL 461647, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
113 So. 3d 949 (Jules v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Washington v. State
120 So. 3d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)