Jules Habitat, Inc. v. Lee

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jules Habitat, Inc. v. Lee

564 So. 2d 263, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5390, 1990 WL 102689

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 24, 1990

DocketNo. 89-2970

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 263 (Jules Habitat, Inc. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jules Habitat, Inc. v. Lee, 564 So. 2d 263, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5390, 1990 WL 102689 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jules Habitat, Incorporated, appeals a final judgment in favor of appel-lee, Walter Lee, on appellee’s action for breach of contract. We affirm.

We base our opinion on the well-settled principle that “[fjindings of fact made by a trial court sitting as fact-finder come to this court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed so long as the findings are supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record.” Malver v. Sheffield Industries, Inc., 502 So.2d 75, 77 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Oceanic International Corporation v. Lantana [264]*264Boatyard, 402 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

We reject the second issue raised by appellant as wholly unsupported by the record. Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 534 So.2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI