Jules Desurmont Worsted Co. v. Julian

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Jules Desurmont Worsted Co. v. Julian

9 R.I. Dec. 124

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 2, 1933

DocketW. C. A. No. 1414

StatusPublished

This text of 9 R.I. Dec. 124 (Jules Desurmont Worsted Co. v. Julian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jules Desurmont Worsted Co. v. Julian, 9 R.I. Dec. 124 (R.I. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

CHURCHILL, J.

Heard on petition for review.

Petitioner asks the Court to order respondent, Lillian Julian, to submit to an operation on pain of losing compensation payments.

Dr. Murray S. Danforth, appointed by the Court as a disinterested expert, reported that he could not find any evidence warranting exploration of the knee, and at the same time reported that the respondent was still unable to use her left leg, owing to the persistence of pain and tenderness.

There was also medical evidence submitted on behalf of the respondent which was of the same general tenor.

The Court therefore finds as a fact that an operation is not necessary, and that the respondent, Lillian Julian, is totally incapacitated for work of the character she was engaged in at the time of the accident.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI