Juledith Holding Corp. v. 91-95 East 18th Street Corp.
This text of 219 A.D. 744 (Juledith Holding Corp. v. 91-95 East 18th Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The complaint is plainly sufficient to warrant a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of the down payment and expense of examining title. This being so, the complaint was improperly dismissed. (Clark v. Levy, 130 App. Div. 389; Perrin v. Smith, 135 id. 127; Kornblum v. Commercial Advertiser Association, 183 id. 615.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 A.D. 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juledith-holding-corp-v-91-95-east-18th-street-corp-nyappdiv-1927.