Juledith Holding Corp. v. 91-95 East 18th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Juledith Holding Corp. v. 91-95 East 18th Street Corp.

219 A.D. 744

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1927·Published

Opinion

Order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The complaint is plainly sufficient to warrant a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of the down payment and expense of examining title. This being so, the complaint was improperly dismissed. (Clark v. Levy, 130 App. Div. 389; Perrin v. Smith, 135 id. 127; Kornblum v. Commercial Advertiser Association, 183 id. 615.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The complaint is plainly sufficient to warrant a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the amount of the down payment and expense of examining title. This being so, the complaint was improperly dismissed. (Clark v. Levy, 130 App. Div. 389; Perrin v. Smith, 135 id. 127; Kornblum v. Commercial Advertiser Association, 183 id. 615.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Juledith Holding Corp. v. 91-95 East 18th Street Corp., 219 A.D. 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

219 A.D. 744 (Juledith Holding Corp. v. 91-95 East 18th Street Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related