Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Juhlin v. Dominguez

Juhlin v. Dominguez

56 A.D.2d 286, 866 N.Y.S.2d 571
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 286 (Juhlin v. Dominguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juhlin v. Dominguez, 56 A.D.2d 286, 866 N.Y.S.2d 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered June 6, 2007, which denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict awarding plaintiff, among other things, $70,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[287]*287Based on the record before us, the damage awards are not against the weight of the evidence and do not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (see Mejia v JMM Audubon, 1 AD3d 261, 262 [2003]).

We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Lippman, EJ., Sweeny, Catterson, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mejia v. JMM Audubon, Inc.
1 A.D.3d 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.D.2d 286, 866 N.Y.S.2d 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juhlin-v-dominguez-nyappdiv-2008.