Juhlin v. Dominguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Juhlin v. Dominguez

56 A.D.2d 286, 866 N.Y.S.2d 571

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2008·Published

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered June 6, 2007, which denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict awarding plaintiff, among other things, $70,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[287]*287Based on the record before us, the damage awards are not against the weight of the evidence and do not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (see Mejia v JMM Audubon, 1 AD3d 261, 262 [2003]).

We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Lippman, EJ., Sweeny, Catterson, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered June 6, 2007, which denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict awarding plaintiff, among other things, $70,000 for past pain and suffering and $20,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[287]*287Based on the record before us, the damage awards are not against the weight of the evidence and do not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (see Mejia v JMM Audubon, 1 AD3d 261, 262 [2003]).

We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Lippman, EJ., Sweeny, Catterson, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.

Juhlin v. Dominguez, 56 A.D.2d 286, 866 N.Y.S.2d 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

56 A.D.2d 286 (Juhlin v. Dominguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related