Juhel v. Rhinelander
2 Johns. Cas. 120
This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 120 (Juhel v. Rhinelander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Juhel v. Rhinelander, 2 Johns. Cas. 120 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
dissenting) said, that they considered the decision, in the case of Seton, Maitland & Co. v. Low, as conclusive, and that the plaintiff' was entitled to judgment accordingly. r
Judgment for the plaintiff.(
(b) Affirmed in the court of errors, in 1802, infra, 487.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Atlantic Fruit Co. v. Solari
238 F. 217 (S.D. New York, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juhel-v-rhinelander-nysupct-1800.