Judy Saxe and Philip Saxe v. Concord Hotel
This text of 383 F.2d 455 (Judy Saxe and Philip Saxe v. Concord Hotel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
383 F.2d 455
Judy SAXE and Philip Saxe, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CONCORD HOTEL, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 31.
Docket 31228.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued September 21, 1967.
Decided September 22, 1967.
Joseph L. Forscher, New York City, (David S. Glassman, New York City, on the brief), for appellees.
Julius Diamond, New York City (William F. McNulty, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant on argument concedes that there was no error in the trial judge's charge. To prevail, appellant must establish that there were no facts showing negligence or from which an inference of negligence could have been drawn. The record discloses sufficient facts to justify submission to the jury. Its verdict should not be disturbed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 F.2d 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judy-saxe-and-philip-saxe-v-concord-hotel-ca2-1967.