Judy K. Blanton v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company

Fifth Circuit

Judy K. Blanton v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company

463 F.2d 421, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8811

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 1972

Docket71-3574

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 463 F.2d 421 (Judy K. Blanton v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Judy K. Blanton v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, 463 F.2d 421, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8811 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of John Hancock Life Insurance Company, we are of the view that there was no genuine issue of fact necessitating a trial. Furthermore, for the reasons explicated by the district court, we agree with its conclusion that the Company was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(c). The opinion of the district court, 345 F.Supp. 168, is adopted as the opinion of this Court; 1

Affirmed.

1

. The trial court did not consider the contention made on appeal that the Company extended credit to the insured in the full amount of the overdue and unpaid premiums. There is no evidence in the record that would support such a contention. We therefore consider this specification of error as frivolous.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of John Hancock Life Insurance Company, we are of the view that there was no genuine issue of fact necessitating a trial. Furthermore, for the reasons explicated by the district court, we agree with its conclusion that the Company was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(c). The opinion of the district court, 345 F.Supp. 168, is adopted as the opinion of this Court; 1

Affirmed.

1

. The trial court did not consider the contention made on appeal that the Company extended credit to the insured in the full amount of the overdue and unpaid premiums. There is no evidence in the record that would support such a contention. We therefore consider this specification of error as frivolous.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 F.2d 421, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judy-k-blanton-v-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-company-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack