Judy Cox Crook F/K/A Judy Cox Swate v. Dian Frances Hartwell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Judy Cox Crook F/K/A Judy Cox Swate v. Dian Frances Hartwell

DecidedMarch 30, 2006

Docket14-06-00139-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Judy Cox Crook F/K/A Judy Cox Swate v. Dian Frances Hartwell (Judy Cox Crook F/K/A Judy Cox Swate v. Dian Frances Hartwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Judy Cox Crook F/K/A Judy Cox Swate v. Dian Frances Hartwell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00139-CV

JUDY COX CROOK F/K/A JUDY COX SWATE, Appellant

V.

DIAN FRANCES HARTWELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 88-11010

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 2, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on February 3, 2006. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $125.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00139-CV

JUDY COX CROOK F/K/A JUDY COX SWATE, Appellant

V.

DIAN FRANCES HARTWELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 88-11010

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 2, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on February 3, 2006. To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the $125.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).

After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Judy Cox Crook F/K/A Judy Cox Swate v. Dian Frances Hartwell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judy-cox-crook-fka-judy-cox-swate-v-dian-frances-h-texapp-2006.