Judson v. Porter
51 Cal. 562
This text of 51 Cal. 562 (Judson v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Judson v. Porter, 51 Cal. 562 (Cal. 1877).
Opinion
It is well settled that one district court cannot enjoin the prosecution of an action pending in another district court. (11 Cal. 76; 9 Id. 614; 37 Id. 269; 39 Id. 162; 47 Id. 626.)
Order reversed, and court below directed to dissolve the restraining order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wolfe v. Titus
56 P. 1042 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Waymire v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.
44 P. 1086 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Cochrane v. McDonald
5 Coffey 235 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
51 Cal. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judson-v-porter-cal-1877.