Judson v. Porter
51 Cal. 562
Opinion
It is well settled that one district court cannot enjoin the prosecution of an action pending in another district court. (11 Cal. 76; 9 Id. 614; 37 Id. 269; 39 Id. 162; 47 Id. 626.)
Order reversed, and court below directed to dissolve the restraining order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Judson v. Porter, 51 Cal. 562 (Cal. 1877).
51 Cal. 562 (Judson v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolfe v. Titus
56 P. 1042 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Waymire v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.
44 P. 1086 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Cochrane v. McDonald
5 Coffey 235 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)