Judson v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Judson v. City of Rochester

12 A.D.2d 734, 208 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6559

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1960

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 A.D.2d 734 (Judson v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Judson v. City of Rochester, 12 A.D.2d 734, 208 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6559 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Special Term’s order directed defendant to produce upon the examination before trial “ the contract, plans and specifications under which said garage was constructed ”, The complaint alleges that plaintiff was injured after alighting from an automobile which had been parked “ in front of a meter number 472 * * * and while proceeding through the passageway provided as a means of exit from said garage”. The examination should be limited to the area in which the alleged accident occurred. No useful purpose can be served by requiring the production of the documents specified in the order for any portion of the building other than the floor on which the injury is alleged to have taken place. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting plaintiffs’ motion for an [735]*735examination of defendant before trial and an examination of certain records.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Special Term’s order directed defendant to produce upon the examination before trial “ the contract, plans and specifications under which said garage was constructed ”, The complaint alleges that plaintiff was injured after alighting from an automobile which had been parked “ in front of a meter number 472 * * * and while proceeding through the passageway provided as a means of exit from said garage”. The examination should be limited to the area in which the alleged accident occurred. No useful purpose can be served by requiring the production of the documents specified in the order for any portion of the building other than the floor on which the injury is alleged to have taken place. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting plaintiffs’ motion for an [735]*735examination of defendant before trial and an examination of certain records.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman and Halpern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 734, 208 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judson-v-city-of-rochester-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack