Judson v. Buckley

31 F. Supp. 246, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3571
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 31 F. Supp. 246 (Judson v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Judson v. Buckley, 31 F. Supp. 246, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3571 (S.D.N.Y. 1940).

Opinion

HULBERT, District Judge.

The issues raised by the plaintiff’s reply to the first and second counterclaims set forth in the answer of the defendant are such as entitled the defendant to a trial by jury as a matter of right. See Moore’s Federal Practice, vol. 3, § 38.02, page 3009; American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co., 260 U.S. 360, 43 S.Ct. 149, 67 L.Ed. 306; Cincinnati, H. & D. R. Co. v. McKeen, 7 Cir., 64 F. 36; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Burger, D.C., 27 F.Supp. S54.

Plaintiff’s motion to strike out demand, conceded to have been timely served, denied and defendant’s motion granted. Settle order on two days’ notice unless consented to as to form.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Folkner v. Collins
91 N.W.2d 545 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1958)
Noonan v. McGuire
11 Pa. D. & C.2d 543 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 1956)
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Wiggins
13 F.R.D. 304 (D. Alaska, 1952)
Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. Ram
91 F. Supp. 778 (E.D. South Carolina, 1950)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Janich
3 F.R.D. 16 (S.D. California, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 F. Supp. 246, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judson-v-buckley-nysd-1940.