Judson v. Buckley
This text of 31 F. Supp. 246 (Judson v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issues raised by the plaintiff’s reply to the first and second counterclaims set forth in the answer of the defendant are such as entitled the defendant to a trial by jury as a matter of right. See Moore’s Federal Practice, vol. 3, § 38.02, page 3009; American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co., 260 U.S. 360, 43 S.Ct. 149, 67 L.Ed. 306; Cincinnati, H. & D. R. Co. v. McKeen, 7 Cir., 64 F. 36; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Burger, D.C., 27 F.Supp. S54.
Plaintiff’s motion to strike out demand, conceded to have been timely served, denied and defendant’s motion granted. Settle order on two days’ notice unless consented to as to form.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 F. Supp. 246, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judson-v-buckley-nysd-1940.