Judkins v. Judkins

109 Mass. 181
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Colt, J.

The petitioner has only a life estate in the premises of which he seeks partition. He is tenant in common for life with his brother Henry B. Judkins. The partition, therefore, can extend only to the interest of which they are seised, and does not affect the rights of those who may have title to the remainder. The devise under which the life tenants claim was upon a condition subsequent, which requires them to take good care of the premises, and restrains them from committing waste; but until there has been a breach of the condition, they have all the rights of tenants of the freehold for life. Gen. Sts. a. 136, §§ 3, 4.

Judgment for partition of the estate for life only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judkins v. Judkins, 109 Mass. 181 (Mass. 1872).

109 Mass. 181 (Judkins v. Judkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hershman-Tcherepnin v. Tcherepnin
891 N.E.2d 194 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2008)
Breare v. Board of Assessors of Peabody
215 N.E.2d 102 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1966)