Judkins v. Ht Window Fashions Corp.
This text of Judkins v. Ht Window Fashions Corp. (Judkins v. Ht Window Fashions Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
REN JUDKINS, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,
v.
HT WINDOW FASHIONS CORP., Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
2010-1336, -1356 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in No. 07-CV-0251, Chief Judge Gary L. Lancaster. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
FREDERICK L. WHITMER, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-cross appellant. Of counsel on the brief were LYNN J. ALSTADT and RALPH G. FISCHER, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. ARNE M. OLSON, Olson & Cepuritis, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID I. ROCHE, Baker & McKenzie, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois. Of counsel on the brief were JOSEPH M. KUO and MATTHEW D. KELLAM, Olson & Cepuritis, LTD., of Chicago, Illinois. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (GAJARSA, MAYER, and O’Malley, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 6, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Judkins v. Ht Window Fashions Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judkins-v-ht-window-fashions-corp-cafc-2011.