Judith Kelsey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

896 F.2d 553, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2971, 1990 WL 17879
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1990
Docket89-1632
StatusUnpublished

This text of 896 F.2d 553 (Judith Kelsey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Judith Kelsey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 896 F.2d 553, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2971, 1990 WL 17879 (6th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

896 F.2d 553

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Judith KELSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-1632.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1990.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, and KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court affirming the decision of the Secretary denying her disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we must reverse.

The only fair reading of reports from the physician who attended plaintiff during her youth is that she is totally disabled from gainful employment as the result of conditions and impairments which have remained essentially unchanged over the years. Accordingly, in view of the lack of substantial evidence to support the Secretary's decision to deny benefits on the basis that plaintiff could engage in substantial gainful work prior to the expiration of her insured status, the Order of the district court entering summary judgment for the Secretary is reversed, and this cause is remanded for payment of benefits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
896 F.2d 553, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2971, 1990 WL 17879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judith-kelsey-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-ca6-1990.