Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp. Read the opinion of the Court — 814 F.3d 156
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 24, 2016·No. 15-1412·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 15-1412

JUDITH CUNNINGHAM; FREDERICK D. DEIMLER, III;

CAROL VANOVER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Appellants

v.

M&T BANK CORP.; M&T BANK;

M&T MORTGAGE REINSURANCE COMPANY, INC.;

MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE CORP.; GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORPORATION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 1-12-cv-01238)

District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

January 12, 2016

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed February 19, 2016)

ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed February 19, 2016, be amended as follows:

On page 13, fourth line down, delete the word “not” at the end of the line so that the phrase reads: It explicitly did “not address . . .

On page 14, tenth line down in the paragraph, insert the word “is” after “This” and before “not” so that the phrase reads: This is not such a case.

By the Court,

s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: February 24, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp, (3d Cir. 2016).

Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp (Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.