Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 15-1412
JUDITH CUNNINGHAM; FREDERICK D. DEIMLER, III;
CAROL VANOVER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Appellants
v.
M&T BANK CORP.; M&T BANK;
M&T MORTGAGE REINSURANCE COMPANY, INC.;
MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE CORP.; GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORPORATION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 1-12-cv-01238)
District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
January 12, 2016
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed February 19, 2016)
ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge
IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed February 19, 2016, be amended as follows:
On page 13, fourth line down, delete the word “not” at the end of the line so that the phrase reads: It explicitly did “not address . . .
On page 14, tenth line down in the paragraph, insert the word “is” after “This” and before “not” so that the phrase reads: This is not such a case.
By the Court,
s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge
Dated: February 24, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp (Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.