Judith Angeloff v. City of Royal Oak

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 2016·No. 153160·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

November 18, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

153159-60 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

JUDITH ANGELOFF, Joan L. Larsen, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 153159 COA: 322643 Oakland CC: 2013-133293-NI CITY OF ROYAL OAK, Defendant-Appellant,

and GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/ JUDITH ANGELOFF, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153160 COA: 322853 Oakland CC: 2013-133293-NI CITY OF ROYAL OAK, Defendant-Appellant,

and GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 18, 2016

t1115 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judith Angeloff v. City of Royal Oak, (Mich. 2016).

Judith Angeloff v. City of Royal Oak (Judith Angeloff v. City of Royal Oak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.