Judith Angeloff v. City of Royal Oak
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
November 18, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
153159-60 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra
Bridget M. McCormack
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein
JUDITH ANGELOFF, Joan L. Larsen, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 153159 COA: 322643 Oakland CC: 2013-133293-NI CITY OF ROYAL OAK, Defendant-Appellant,
and GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/ JUDITH ANGELOFF, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v SC: 153160 COA: 322853 Oakland CC: 2013-133293-NI CITY OF ROYAL OAK, Defendant-Appellant,
and GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
November 18, 2016
t1115 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Judith Angeloff v. City of Royal Oak (Judith Angeloff v. City of Royal Oak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.