Judicial Ethics Opinion 2015-2

2015 OK JUD ETH 2, 363 P.3d 466, 2015 WL 5011929
CourtOklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel
DecidedJuly 29, 2015
DocketNo. 2015-2
StatusPublished

This text of 2015 OK JUD ETH 2 (Judicial Ethics Opinion 2015-2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Judicial Ethics Opinion 2015-2, 2015 OK JUD ETH 2, 363 P.3d 466, 2015 WL 5011929 (Okla. Super. Ct. 2015).

Opinion

Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel

1 1 Question:

May a judge write a letter on behalf of a close relative (particular inquiry involves a grandson) who has been found guilty of a crime and is awaiting sentencing in another court?

12 Answer: No. -

T 3 Discussion:

Canon 2, Rule 2:10 provides:

"A judge shall not make any public statement that might ... substantially interfere with a fair trial or hearing

Canon 8, Rule 3:8 provides:

"A judge shall not testify as a character witness in a judicial, administrative, or other adjudicatory proceeding ... .except when duly summoned.",

1 4 We believe that these provisions of the Oklahoma Code of Judicial Conduct clearly prohibit the writing of a letter on behalf of anyone and that. public perception would even strengthen the prohibition when the party is a close relative.

T5 Our research indicates that this is the view of ethics advisory panels in other states who have considered the question. The pamphlet published by the American Adjudicator Society titled "Recommendations by Judges" states "... most judicial advisory opinions have advised that a judge may not write a letter to another judge in connection with sentencing of a defendant in criminal matters »

/8/Honorable Milton Craig, Chairman /$/Honorable Edward Cunningham, Member

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 OK JUD ETH 2, 363 P.3d 466, 2015 WL 5011929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judicial-ethics-opinion-2015-2-oklajeap-2015.