Home/Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel/Judicial Ethics Opinion 2004-3

Judicial Ethics Opinion 2004-3

2004 OK JUD ETH 3, 99 P.3d 1234, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 109, 2004 WL 2399530
Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel·Decided October 27, 2004·No. No. 2004-3.·Published

Opinion

QUESTION: May a judge charge a reasonable fee for performing a wedding after court hours outside of the courthouse?

ANSWER: No

DISCUSSION:

Canon 4 D. Financial Activities.

(1) A judge should not engage in financial dealings that:
(a) may reasonably be perceived to exploit the judge's judicial position, or ..."

Personal retention of payment for performing a marriage is an exploitation of judicial office for personal gain. But for the judge's judicial status, the judge would not have the legal capacity to perform a legally binding marriage ceremony.

/s/ Robert L. Bailey, Chairman

/s/ Robert D. Simms, Viee Chairman

/s/ Milton C. Craig, Secretary

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judicial Ethics Opinion 2004-3, 2004 OK JUD ETH 3, 99 P.3d 1234, 2004 Okla. LEXIS 109, 2004 WL 2399530 (Okla. Super. Ct. 2004).

2004 OK JUD ETH 3 (Judicial Ethics Opinion 2004-3) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.