Judicial Ethics Opinion 1998-3

1998 OK JUD ETH 3, 86 P.3d 648, 1998 WL 34202414
CourtOklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel
DecidedMarch 26, 1998
DocketNo. 1998-3
StatusPublished

This text of 1998 OK JUD ETH 3 (Judicial Ethics Opinion 1998-3) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Judicial Ethics Opinion 1998-3, 1998 OK JUD ETH 3, 86 P.3d 648, 1998 WL 34202414 (Okla. Super. Ct. 1998).

Opinion

QUESTION: Is a sitting appointed judge required to resign in order to establish a [649]*649committee, in order to prepare to run for a judicial election, under the guidelines of Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct? Is there a statutory mandate in either Title 26 Oklahoma Statute, Sec 5-101 et seq. or Title 20 Oklahoma Statute requiring such resignation?

ANSWER: Insofar as the Code of Judicial Conduct is concerned, we are of the opinion that Canon 5 does not require an appointed sitting judge to resign in order to prepare to run for judicial office. We believe however, that it is inappropriate for this panel to give an advisory opinion as to interpretation of these statutes which may impact the questions; our authority under Supreme Court Rule 55 is limited to opinions concerning the compliance of an intended future course of conduct with the Code of Judicial Conduct.

/s/ Robert L. Bailey, Chairman

/s/ Robert A. Layden, Vice Chairman

/s/ Milton C. Craig, Secretary

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1998 OK JUD ETH 3, 86 P.3d 648, 1998 WL 34202414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judicial-ethics-opinion-1998-3-oklajeap-1998.